Has Obama been disrespected more than usual for a president?

I'm still young (20) and didn't really develop my passionate interest for politics until 18, so I don't remember much of Bush but when I watch how the media treats Obama they can be downright disrespectful to the commander in chief. I realize we have the right to speak ill of him btw.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

8th president of pakistan

Image
Nurul Amin (1971 – 1973) Nurul Amin, referred to as the Patriot of Pakistan, was a prominent Pakistani leader, jurist, national conservative, and Party Chairman of the Muslim League, the founding party of Pakistan. In Office:  7 December 1971 – 20 December 1971 Status:  Elected democratically Political Party:  Pakistan Muslim League Total Duration:  13 Days Only Post Abolished:  20 December 1971 – 14 August 1973 Total Duration of Abolishment:  1 Year, 7 Months, 25 Days
Read more

Why did CNN give Obama an 8 year pass in investigative journalism, but is now actively persecuting Donald trump?

Obama has demonstrated himself to be a very careful person regarding his own image and actions, to a fault. He is strong organizer and team builder. His skills are much more that of a GM or COO* than, say, a CEO or head of Sales, when you draw parallels with the corporate world. As Terry Irving responded ( Why did CNN give Obama an 8 year pass in investigative journalism, but is now actively persecuting Donald trump? ), CNN, and I understand, all major news agencies, had units designated to dig into his past and present. None found anything “scandalous”. Before Obama made a name for himself on the national stage at the 2004 Democratic Convention, he barely got any media coverage. DJT, on the other hand, was a media magnet since the late 80s due to his long running and well known “foot-in-mouth” disease. He’s outrageous, thin-skinned and picks very public fights over nothing. Follow DJT around, and he will say something “scandalous” sooner than later. The mainstream media actual...
Read more

Why is President of the United States of America more powerful compared to, say, Prime Minister of England?

The answer to your question would depend on your definition of “powerful”. The ultimate extension would be “Why can the President of the United States of America (after this “the President”) employ more armed force than can the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland (from now on “the PM”)?” and the answer to that one is the self-evident “Because the United States of America has a larger military than the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland does.”. On the other hand, if the PM wants a piece of legislation passed, that piece of legislation is going to get passed and if the PM does not want a piece of legislation passed then that piece of legislation is not going to get passed. Admittedly the President has a lot more latitude in the field from which they can choose their Cabinet member than the PM does, BUT once the PM decides who a Cabinet member is going to be, that’s the end of the discussion and when the PM decides that a Cabinet member is no longer acceptab...
Read more